Back
Back
Back
Back
Back
Back
Back
Back
Back
Back
Back
Back
Back
Back
Back
Back
Back

Creating Enforceable Agreements Electronically

Written by: John Bentas

3/22/2020

With most people working remotely because of self-quarantining or legally mandated sheltering in place, many find themselves with limited or no access to their usual business tools, such as scanners and printers.  As businesses try to continue to operate, including entering into agreements, can a legally binding agreement be created if you are not able to print and physically sign the agreement?  The answer is likely yes because of the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act.

The Uniform Electronic Transactions Act, which has been adopted and in place for many years in Massachusetts and New Hampshire, removes barriers to e-commerce and provides a legal framework for the use of electronic signatures and records in business transactions.  Under the UETA, electronic records and signatures have the same legal effect as printed contracts and handwritten signatures.

Under the UETA, a transaction or signature may not be denied legal effect or enforceability solely because it is in electronic form.  If a law requires a signature, an electronic signature satisfies the law. There are some limitations to this, including laws governing the creation and execution of wills, codicils, or testamentary trusts and certain contracts governed by the Uniform Commercial Code.  Otherwise, the UETA is intended to by applied broadly.

The keys to the application of the UETA are that (1) the parties have expressly agreed to conduct the transaction electronically and (2) the electronic record or electronic signature is attributable to a person so long it was the act of the person. The parties can explicitly agree to conduct a transaction electronically by clearly manifesting that intent, even in an electronic format.  Therefore, it should be made clear in the communications between the parties that the use of e-mail or other electronic means (such as Word documents) will be the methods of doing business between them (i.e., they will be binding).  A person can opt out of the UETA at any time by notifying the other party.

So what happens if someone sends you a contract in Word or PDF format via an electronic mail? Do you now have a binding contract because they sent it to you and you previously agreed to this format as binding?  The answer is no.  The second component of the UETA requires that you have to “sign” or assent to the transaction by a means that is attributable to you as your act.  Under the UETA, an electronic signature can be a sound, symbol, or process, so long as the signature is attached to or logically associated with the contract or record and executed or adopted with the intent to sign the record.  Whether any given electronic signature is valid depends on the facts and circumstances.  Therefore, if you open the Word document and type your name in the signature line and send it back, or even reply to the original e-mail with a clear indication of assent (e.g., “I am fine with the contract you sent”), then you likely have a binding contract at that point. 

Although it is not required under the UETA, it is prudent to establish a “security procedure” to ensure that the person you are dealing with on the other end of the electronic communication is the person actually signing the document.  This can be accomplished by use of third party software (e.g., DocuSign). The same effect can be achieved though through a call-back procedure by calling the other party to the agreement and confirming that they sent the email back to you.

In conclusion, when using electronic records and signatures, you must make sure that the parties to a transaction consent to the use of the electronic means and that each signatory, when signing, intends to sign the record as his or her act.

Integrity and trust

At McLane Middleton we establish and maintain long-standing relationships with our clients to help us better achieve their unique goals over time. This approach to building trust requires that our esteemed lawyers and professionals use their broad, in-depth knowledge and work together with integrity to ascertain sound resolutions to legal matters for their clients.

Strength in numbers

McLane Middleton is made up of more than 105 attorneys who represent a broad range of clients throughout the region, delivering customized solutions. As a firm we are recognized as having the highest legal ability rating. The firm is rated Preeminent by Martindale Hubbell and is recognized as one of the nation's leading law firms in Chambers USA. Our attorneys are distinguished leaders in their respective practice areas.

Meet Our People

Commitment and collaboration

McLane Middleton's versatile group of attorneys and paralegals become trusted authorities on each case through collaboration. We work with our clients to learn their individual needs first and foremost and, together, we develop comprehensive solutions to their specific legal matters. This approach helps us exceed our clients' expectations efficiently and effectively, client by client, case by case.

Practice Areas

A history of excellence

McLane Middleton was established in 1919 in New Hampshire, and has five offices across two states. However, deep historical roots don't allow you to become innate. Our firm is organized, technological, and knowledgeable. Our history means we are recognized. But our reputation is built on the highest quality of service and experience in very specific areas of law.

The Firm

Intelligence paired with action

Our team continuously seeks opportunities to enhance their professional development and put key learnings to action. The pursuit of further insight guides us to volunteer service opportunities, speaking engagements, and teaching roles. Our lawyers are sought after thought leaders across their industries, and recipients of leadership awards throughout the region.