- Travel is mentioned in recruitment advertisements and the Form ETA 9141 Prevailing Wage Determination, but omitted from the worksites listed on Form ETA 9089.
- Travel requirements are vague or broadly defined, prompting DOL questions about the frequency, nature, duration, and purpose of the travel.
- Various worksite locations are listed without sufficient specificity, leading the DOL to question the intended area(s) of employment.
Client Alert: PERM Denials on the Rise – Travel and Worksite Issues Under Scrutiny
Published: Employment Law Business Guide
October 16, 2025
U.S. employers filing PERM (Program Electronic Review Management) Labor Certification Applications are now facing increased scrutiny regarding how they disclose travel-related job requirements on Form ETA 9089. Recently, the Department of Labor (DOL) has begun denying PERM applications—without audit—for allegedly incomplete or inconsistent disclosure of travel requirements.
The DOL now appears to take the position that any travel requirement, regardless of significance, must be disclosed as a separate worksite location on Form ETA 9089. This shift is concerning, as the agency had approved applications without such detail for the past two years and has provided no formal notice of this change in adjudication practices.
So far, the following specific issues have been identified: